Why Even Your Bullshit Accounts Deserve Strong Passwords

https://ift.tt/2GQFP0V

This week, password manager Dashlane analyzed ten years’ worth of passwords from public data breaches. The big lesson is, don’t reuse passwords. Not even a little, not even with a “formula.” Password formulas are easy to hack. And even your bullshit accounts deserve strong, unique passwords.

If you’ve reused passwords from any of these 284 hacked sites, including MySpace, LinkedIn, Adult Friend Finder, 8tracks, and Adobe, any bored hacker could try those exposed passwords on your other accounts. (In many of these breaches, the leaked passwords were still encrypted. But some of the encryption was so weak that hackers were still able to decrypt short or common passwords.)

So don’t reuse passwords on multiple sites and services.

“But,” you say, “I only reuse my password on my bullshit accounts!” Really, you’d be fine with all your “bullshit” accounts getting exposed at once, just because your old Hotmail account got hacked? Are all those accounts really so “bullshit”?

Anything with your credit card info isn’t a bullshit account

If logging into a certain account lets you spend money, you should probably put that behind a strong password. If you just made a one-time login to ThinkGeek, and you used the same password as your old AIM account, you made it easy for a stranger to mail themselves official Young Han Solo jackets on your dime. Do you really want to replace your credit card and do all the attendant paperwork just because you used the same password on Nordstrom Rack and 9GAG?

Anything with your social identity isn’t a bullshit account

If you logged into some trendy social media site with your bullshit password, and then that trendy social media site ended up being Twitter, it’s probably time to change it. Maybe you won’t be embarrassed when your account DMs all your friends with spam links! Maybe your aunt is too smart to fall for a scammer messaging her from your hacked account! Maybe the hacker will get more retweets than you! Seriously, have some self-respect and get a new password for each of your social accounts.

Advertisement

Dashlane senior manager Ryan Merchant points out that personal info in one account can be used to access your other accounts. This mostly matters if someone is specifically targeting you, but it’s one way that a small breach can turn into a big one. So even those truly bullshit accounts are useful to someone targeting you for identity theft.

Anything you don’t want to delete isn’t a bullshit account

If handling all these old accounts sounds exhausting, delete them. (AccountKiller has specific instructions for deleting most online accounts). But if you have too much emotional attachment to delete an account, then you have too much attachment to let it get hacked.

This is all easier if you have a password manager. And yes, some day maybe a password manager could get hacked. But so far, all of our major recommendations have a much better track record than sites like AOL, Yahoo, and LinkedIn. And a life without memorizing passwords is a life with less stress.



from Lifehacker http://lifehacker.com
via IFTTT

Don't Worry About That Diet Soda Habit: Artificial Sweeteners Are Harmless, Say Scientists

https://ift.tt/2sbe5yI

Good news for fans of diet drinks and sugar-free sweets: You can safely ignore the hype about zero-calorie sweeteners somehow triggering weight gain and metabolic issues, according to a team of U.S. and European scientists.

The potential paradox of diet soda fueling weight gain had a lot of traction in popular health media. But this idea was based on inconsistent rodent research results, plus human studies that found links between artificial-sweetener consumption and ill effects but not a causal relationship .

Beyond Calories

A new article in the journal Obesity Reviews summarizes last year's "Beyond Calories—Diet and Cardiometabolic Health" conference, sponsored by the CrossFit Foundation. The event convened doctors, obesity researchers, molecular biologists, nutrition scientists, and other academics from the U.S., Denmark, and Germany to consider whether all calories are "equal with regard to effects on cardiometabolic disease and obesity."

"There is no doubt that positive energy balance, due to excessive caloric consumption and/or inadequate physical activity, is the main driver of the obesity and cardiometabolic epidemics," write Janet King and Laura Schmidt in the paper's introduction. But there's also evidence that "certain dietary components increase risk" for heart disease and weight gain in ways that go beyond a simple tradeoff between calories consumed and calories burned.

In the case of diet soda and its ilk, there are all sorts of theories about how these drinks could sneakily imitate the effects of sugary beverages. It was posited that they might trigger our sweet taste receptors to crave more sweet things after consumption, that they might alter our gut bacteria in a negative way, or that they induce a biochemical response as if real sugar had been consumed.

Some speculated that "caloric compensation occurs, negating calories 'saved,'" writes Allison Sylvetsky in a section of the article that deals with non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). "This compensation could be psychological, whereby one's knowledge of consuming a lower‐calorie NNS‐containing alternative may lead to giving oneself permission for greater calorie ingestion at subsequent meals," or it "could be physiological, in which consumption of lower‐calorie NNS‐containing alternatives promotes heightened hunger and subsequently higher calorie intake."

But that wasn't much more than speculation. "Two separate meta‐analyses consisting of 10 and eight [randomized controlled trials] both indicated that substituting [artificial sweeteners] for sugar resulted in a modest weight loss in adults," notes Sylvetsky. "In 62 of 90 animal studies, NNS did not increase body weight, and a more recent meta‐analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies did not support an association between NNS consumption and BMI."

Embracing Aspartame

The most popular artificial sweetener these days is aspartame, which can be found in most diet soft drinks. Acesulfame Potatassium, Sucralose (sold in the U.S. as Splenda), and substances derived from the stevia plant are also popular. The paper cautions that aspartame has much more safety evidence on its side than the others, as it has been studied much more extensively. (There's no particular reason to think the others will prove any less safe, but none has been studied "for periods no longer than 16 weeks.")

Aspartame has been controversial for decades, but fears over its alleged links to everything from Alzheimer's disease to brain cancer, diabetes, leukemia, and weight gain have proven unfounded. (Such was also the case with saccharine before it.) And there have been ample randomized controlled trials to study its effects.

"It does not appear that any of these [trials] revealed adverse effects of NNS consumption on risk factors for cardiometabolic disease," writes Sylvetsky, summing up the research. In one six-month study, overweight and obese participants were assigned to drink either sucrose‐sweetened cola, aspartame‐sweetened cola, water, or low-fat milk. Researchers found "no significant differences between the effects of aspartame‐sweetened cola and water on body weight, visceral adiposity, liver fat and metabolic risk factors."

In "the longest intervention study conducted to date," 163 obese women were randomly assigned to have or avoid aspartame‐sweetened foods and drinks during a several-month weight-loss program, a one-year weight-maintenace program, and a two-year follow-up period. "The aspartame group lost significantly more weight overall," reports Sylvetsky, "and regained significantly less weight during the 1‐year maintenance and the 2‐year follow‐up than the no‐aspartame group."

Controlled trials "consistently demonstrate" that consuming aspartame and other artificial sweeteners is associated with decreased calorie consumption, the paper concludes. And "there are no clinical intervention studies involving chronic [sweetener] exposure in which [it] induced a weight increase relative to sugar, water or habitual diet."

The team of researchers suggests that more studies should be done on on the effects of artificially-sweetened beverages on children and on how consumption of these drinks is related to glucose tolerance and inflammation.



from Hit & Run : Reason Magazine https://reason.com/blog
via IFTTT

'Westworld' Recap, Season 2 Episode 5: More Dead Than Alive

https://ift.tt/2x085P7


There are many things that Westworld is. It is artful. Its scenes are sculpted with the same beauty and care that went into building the robots' exquisite bodies. It explores with delicacy the adjacent modes of consciousness that accompany sophisticated artificial intelligence.

And then there are the things that Westworld is not. Warm, intimate, relatable, human? Nope, not lately. There is, for starters, the total absence of meaningful relationships. Both Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood) and Maeve (Thandie Newton) have doting lovers, sure, but their ardor has the nuance of an elementary school crush. Friendships? None. Familial bonds? Only deeply twisted ones. The most intimate moment of the season is in the show's opening sequence, when an anonymous robo-mom tenderly holds her baby.

That emptiness weighs on the second season's fifth episode, which centers on a side-quest into Shogun World, where Japanese clichés are prettily layered onto Westworld's themes. Maeve, Hector (Rodrigo Santoro), and the others come across an Edo-era town that bears a striking resemblance to Sweetwater. As Armistice (Ingrid Berdal) watches a Japanese version of her and Hector shoot up the town, Lee Sizemore (Simon Quarterman) admits to cribbing from Westworld's plot lines and characters when writing Shogun World. In this new park, Maeve and her minions are observers as much as actors, marveling at the sight of themselves brought to life in different bodies. The conceit has a philosophical, Westworld-appropriate ring to it. But the execution is hokey, with even Lee Sizemore rolling his eyes at the hosts' fascination with their mirrored selves.

The group has stumbled off-course from Maeve's hunt for her daughter, which remains their primary goal. We know that finding Maeve's daughter is a Big Important Theme. We're surely headed towards some mind-bending reveal when this daughter emerges at last. Yet it also remains another of Westworld's extremely shallow storylines. Viewers are told almost nothing about the gravity of this relationship, which is shown time and again as a snapshot memory of a beautiful child, a few seconds of extreme brutality, a glimpse of mother and daughter walking hand-in-hand through tall grasses, and little else. While we wait for Maeve to find her girl, we take on faith that her motherly instincts are a natural consequence of her inner life, and try to squish down worries that all this daughter business is just a transparent plot device to keep her marching around the parks.

This episode centers on a parallel tragedy involving Japanese Maeve, named Akane (Rinko Kikuchi), and the girl she thinks of as her daughter. An emissary for the Shogun visits the Japanese version of the Mariposa Saloon and orders Akane to hand over that daughter, a young geisha named Sakura. Akane refuses and kills the emissary. Japanese Hector urges them to flee before the wrath of the Shogun descends upon them—but first they inexplicably all decide to take a nap. While they're resting, the Shogun's ninjas swarm the place and deliver a beating to Maeve's minions. But as one ninja slowly strangles Maeve, she taps into her host-controlling superpower. Her attacker suddenly releases her and drives a knife through his own skull. It's not wit or grit that saves the day, but magic.

The show is in a tough moment. Its leading ladies, Maeve and Dolores, are flush with power. Maeve can escape any death threat by getting her mind in the right gear, and Dolores is ruthless, cunning, and granted various advantages through Ford's machinations. They both travel with lab techs in tow, giving them backdoor access to their own code as needed. They traipse around with an air of superiority that seems ripe for a takedown, yet episode after episode they skate past obstacles.

The avenging Dolores who dominates Season 2 is stuck in one emotionless mode. She's more of an automaton now than she was before discovering her robot nature.

In Shogun World, we get treated to not one but two displays of Maeve's secret mind control skill. In a sad twist, she and her band of supporters go to visit the Shogun, who kills Sakura simply because he can. Akane manages to get close to him and saws his head off. That might seem like a dangerous move to pull within the Shogun's own encampment, but don't worry! Maeve can deactivate all the bad guys by casting her witchy spells.

Her mind control skill isn't totally unbelievable, even if it is unsatisfying to watch. It's possible Maeve has managed to access some wireless communication protocol that allows her to transmit data to the other hosts, effectively taking over their minds. But her adventures in Shogun World don't explore the limits of that power, which could trigger self-reflection or self-doubt. These trials have no impact on her internal life.

Then there's Dolores. Oh, Dolores. Let's take a moment to mourn what she's become so far in this season. She is cold, distant, calculating—flat. For someone who insists she's discovering her true nature, she is unfazed by the two personalities jammed into her body. We've seen Evan Rachel Wood navigate the delicate shifts demanded of her character in other settings, switching deftly in and out of analysis mode, for example. But the avenging Dolores who dominates Season 2 is stuck in one emotionless mode. She's more of an automaton now than she was before discovering her robot nature.

In this episode, she and Teddy (James Marsden) are back in Sweetwater. He urges her to give up her quest and start a new life with him. Somehow Teddy never questions his devotion to her, even though she shows no trace of the rancher's daughter he was first programmed to love. Nor does he seem to notice that their chemistry has dipped below zero. After engaging in unwatchable sex, Dolores declares him unfit for their quest and orders the lab tech in her coterie to alter Teddy's stats without his consent. With Teddy pinned and screaming, the lab tech maxes out his bulk apperception, aggression, and cruelty, among other bellicose traits, while erasing his likable attributes, such as empathy and imagination. She kills him from the inside as a matter of business.

With Dolores and Maeve both pursuing their single-minded quests, they fail to engage in any meaningful way with the people around them. But hang on, you say, Westworld is a show about getting to know one's true self. The reason the characters come off as self-absorbed is that they finally have a self to call their own. Maybe so. But the good stuff emerges only when we turn our gazes outward, towards others. Let's hope Westworld rediscovers that fundamental human truth, and gives its extraordinary robots more chances to love, learn, and lose.


More Great WIRED Stories



from Feed: All Latest https://ift.tt/2uc60ci
via IFTTT

The Pentagon Can't Account for $21T

https://ift.tt/2ImR96B


Twenty-one trillion dollars.

The Pentagon’s own numbers show that it can’t account for $21 trillion. Yes, I mean trillion with a “T.” And this could change everything.

But I’ll get back to that in a moment.

There are certain things the human mind is not meant to do. Our complex brains cannot view the world in infrared, cannot spell words backward during orgasm and cannot really grasp numbers over a few thousand. A few thousand, we can feel and conceptualize. We’ve all been in stadiums with several thousand people. We have an idea of what that looks like (and how sticky the floor gets).

But when we get into the millions, we lose it. It becomes a fog of nonsense. Visualizing it feels like trying to hug a memory. We may know what $1 million can buy (and we may want that thing), but you probably don’t know how tall a stack of a million $1 bills is. You probably don’t know how long it takes a minimum-wage employee to make $1 million.

That’s why trying to understand—truly understand—that the Pentagon spent 21 trillion unaccounted-for dollars between 1998 and 2015 washes over us like your mother telling you that your third cousin you met twice is getting divorced. It seems vaguely upsetting, but you forget about it 15 seconds later because … what else is there to do?

Twenty-one trillion.

But let’s get back to the beginning. A couple of years ago, Mark Skidmore, an economics professor, heard Catherine Austin Fitts, former assistant secretary in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, say that the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General had found $6.5 trillion worth of unaccounted-for spending in 2015. Skidmore, being an economics professor, thought something like, “She means $6.5 billion. Not trillion. Because trillion would mean the Pentagon couldn’t account for more money than the gross domestic product of the whole United Kingdom. But still, $6.5 billion of unaccounted-for money is a crazy amount.”

So he went and looked at the inspector general’s report, and he found something interesting: It was trillion! It was fucking $6.5 trillion in 2015 of unaccounted-for spending! And I’m sorry for the cursing, but the word “trillion” is legally obligated to be prefaced with “fucking.” It is indeed way more than the U.K.’s GDP.

Skidmore did a little more digging. As Forbes reported in December 2017, “[He] and Catherine Austin Fitts … conducted a search of government websites and found similar reports dating back to 1998. While the documents are incomplete, original government sources indicate $21 trillion in unsupported adjustments have been reported for the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the years 1998-2015.”

Let’s stop and take a second to conceive how much $21 trillion is (which you can’t because our brains short-circuit, but we’ll try anyway).

1. The amount of money supposedly in the stock market is $30 trillion.

2. The GDP of the United States is $18.6 trillion.

3. Picture a stack of money. Now imagine that that stack of dollars is all $1,000 bills. Each bill says “$1,000” on it. How high do you imagine that stack of dollars would be if it were $1 trillion. It would be 63 miles high.

4. Imagine you make $40,000 a year. How long would it take you to make $1 trillion? Well, don’t sign up for this task, because it would take you 25 million years (which sounds like a long time, but I hear that the last 10 million really fly by because you already know your way around the office, where the coffee machine is, etc.).

The human brain is not meant to think about a trillion dollars.

And it’s definitely not meant to think about the $21 trillion our Department of Defense can’t account for. These numbers sound bananas. They sound like something Alex Jones found tattooed on his backside by extraterrestrials.

But the 21 trillion number comes from the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General—the OIG. Although, as Forbes pointed out, “after Mark Skidmore began inquiring about OIG-reported unsubstantiated adjustments, the OIG’s webpage, which documented, albeit in a highly incomplete manner, these unsupported “accounting adjustments,” was mysteriously taken down.”

Luckily, people had already grabbed copies of the report, which—for now—you can view here.

Here’s something else important from that Forbes article—which is one of the only mainstream media articles you can find on the largest theft in American history:

Given that the entire Army budget in fiscal year 2015 was $120 billion, unsupported adjustments were 54 times the level of spending authorized by Congress.

That’s right. The expenses with no explanation were 54 times the actual budget allotted by Congress. Well, it’s good to see Congress is doing 1/54th of its job of overseeing military spending (that’s actually more than I thought Congress was doing). This would seem to mean that 98 percent of every dollar spent by the Army in 2015 was unconstitutional.

So, pray tell, what did the OIG say caused all this unaccounted-for spending that makes Jeff Bezos’ net worth look like that of a guy jingling a tin can on the street corner?

“[The July 2016 inspector general] report indicates that unsupported adjustments are the result of the Defense Department’s ‘failure to correct system deficiencies.’

They blame trillions of dollars of mysterious spending on a “failure to correct system deficiencies”? That’s like me saying I had sex with 100,000 wild hairless aardvarks because I wasn’t looking where I was walking.

Twenty-one trillion.

Say it slowly to yourself.

At the end of the day, there are no justifiable explanations for this amount of unaccounted-for, unconstitutional spending. Right now, the Pentagon is being audited for the first time ever, and it’s taking 2,400 auditors to do it. I’m not holding my breath that they’ll actually be allowed to get to the bottom of this.

But if the American people truly understood this number, it would change both the country and the world. It means that the dollar is sprinting down a path toward worthless. If the Pentagon is hiding spending that dwarfs the amount of tax dollars coming in to the federal government, then it’s clear the government is printing however much it wants and thinking there are no consequences. Once these trillions are considered, our fiat currency has even less meaning than it already does, and it’s only a matter of time before inflation runs wild.

It also means that any time our government says it “doesn’t have money” for a project, it’s laughable. It can clearly “create” as much as it wants for bombing and death. This would explain how Donald Trump’s military can drop well over 100 bombs a day that cost well north of $1 million each.

So why can’t our government also “create” endless money for health care, education, the homeless, veterans benefits and the elderly, to make all parking free and to pay the Rolling Stones to play stoop-front shows in my neighborhood? (I’m sure the Rolling Stones are expensive, but surely a trillion dollars could cover a couple of songs.)

Obviously, our government could do those things, but it chooses not to. Earlier this month, Louisiana sent eviction notices to 30,000 elderly people on Medicaid to kick them out of their nursing homes. Yes, a country that can vomit trillions of dollars down a black hole marked “Military” can’t find the money to take care of our poor elderly. It’s a repulsive joke.

Twenty-one trillion.

Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates spoke about how no one knows where the money is flying in the Pentagon. In a barely reported speech in 2011, he said, “My staff and I learned that it was nearly impossible to get accurate information and answers to questions such as, ‘How much money did you spend?’ and ‘How many people do you have?’

They can’t even find out how many people work for a specific department?

Note for anyone looking for a job: Just show up at the Pentagon and tell them you work there. It doesn’t seem like they’d have much luck proving you don’t.

For more on this story, check out David DeGraw’s excellent reporting at ChangeMaker.media, because the mainstream corporate media are mouthpieces for the weapons industry. They are friends with benefits of the military-industrial complex. I have seen basically nothing from the mainstream corporate media concerning this mysterious $21 trillion. I missed the time when CNN’s Wolf Blitzer said that the money we dump into war and death—either the accounted-for money or the secretive trillions—could end world hunger and poverty many times over. There’s no reason anybody needs to be starving or hungry or unsheltered on this planet, but our government seems hellbent on proving that it stands for nothing but profiting off death and misery. And our media desperately want to show they stand for nothing but propping up our morally bankrupt empire.

When the media aren’t actively promoting war, they’re filling the airwaves with shit, so the entire country can’t even hear itself think. Our whole mindscape is filled to the brim with nonsense and vacant celebrity idiocy. Then, while no one is looking, the largest theft humankind has ever seen is going on behind our backs—covered up under the guise of “national security.”

Twenty-one trillion.

Don’t forget.

If you think this column is important, please share it. And check out Lee Camp’s weekly TV show, “Redacted Tonight.” Camp also is taping a new live stand-up special in Los Angeles on May 18 and 19. He’ll be doing over an hour of his new comedy, and special guest Jimmy Dore will be on the show. You can purchase tickets here.

Truthdig has launched a reader-funded project—its first ever—to document the Poor People’s Campaign. Please help us by making a donation.



from Hacker News https://ift.tt/YV9WJO
via IFTTT

'Reluctant Psychonaut' Michael Pollan Embraces the 'New Science' of Psychedelics

https://ift.tt/2IKzEQU


Images Etc Ltd/Getty Images

Images Etc Ltd/Getty Images

Author Michael Pollan had always been curious about psychoactive plants, but his interest skyrocketed when he heard about a research study in which people with terminal cancer were given a psychedelic called psilocybin — the active ingredient in "magic mushrooms" — to help them deal with their distress.

"This seemed like such a crazy idea that I began looking into it," Pollan says. "Why should a drug from a mushroom help people deal with their mortality?"

Pollan, whose previous books include The Omnivore's Dilemma and In Defense Of Food, started researching different experimental therapeutic uses of psychedelics, and found that the drugs were being used to treat depression, addiction and the fear of death.

Then he decided to go one step further: A self-described "reluctant psychonaut," Pollan enlisted guides to help him experiment with LSD, psilocybin and 5-MeO-DMT, a substance in the venom of the Sonoran Desert toad.

Each of Pollan's experiences with psychedelics was proceeded by worry and self-doubt. But, he says, "I realized later that was my ego trying to convince me not to do this thing that was going to challenge my ego."

Pollan's new book, How to Change Your Mind: What the New Science of Psychedelics Teaches Us About Consciousness, Dying, Addiction, Depression, and Transcendence, recounts his experiences with the drugs and also examines the history of psychedelics as well as their possible therapeutic uses.


Interview Highlights

On how the psychedelic psilocybin is administered in therapy for depression

The way [psilocybin is] being used is in a very controlled or guided setting. ... They don't just give you a pill and send you home; you're in a room. You're with two guides, one male, one female. You're lying down on a comfortable couch. You're wearing headphones listening to a really carefully curated playlist of music — instrumental compositions for the most part — and you're wearing eyeshades, all of which is to encourage a very inward journey.

Someone is kind of looking out for you, and they prepare you very carefully in advance. They give you a set of "flight instructions," as they call them, which is what to do if you get really scared or you're beginning to have a bad trip. If you see a monster, for example, don't try to run away. Walk right up to it, plant your feet and say, "What do you have to teach me? What are you doing in my mind?" And if you do that, according to the flight instructions, your fear will morph into something much more positive very quickly.

On how psychedelics can help change the stories we tell about ourselves

The drugs foster new perspectives on old problems. One of the things our mind does is tell stories about ourselves. If you're depressed, you're being told a story perhaps that you're worthless, that no one could possibly love you, you're not worthy of love, that life will not get better. And these stories — which are enforced by our egos really — trap us in these ruminative loops that are very hard to get out of. They're very destructive patterns of thought.

What the drugs appear to do is disable for a period of time the part of the brain where the self talks to itself. It's called the default mode network, and it's a group of structures that connect parts of the cortex — the evolutionarily most recent part of the brain — to deeper levels where emotion and memory reside. And it's a very important hub in the brain and lots of important things happen there: self-reflection and rumination, time travel. It's where we go to think about the future or the past, and theory of mind, the ability to imagine the mental states of other beings and, I think, most importantly, the autobiographical self. It's the part of the brain, it appears, where we incorporate things that happen to us, new information, with a sense of who we are, who we were and who we want to be. And that's where these stories get generated. And these stories can be really destructive, they trap us. ...

This network is downregulated [with psychedelics], it sort of goes offline for a period of time. And that's why you experience this dissolution of self or ego, which can be a terrifying or liberating thing, depending on your mindset. This is what allows people, I think, to have those new perspectives on themselves, to realize that they needn't be trapped in those stories and they might actually be able to write some new stories about themselves. That's what's liberating, I think, about the experience when it works.

On how psychedelics can help dying people face their deaths

Prozac doesn't help when you're confronting your mortality. But here we have something that occasions an experience in people — a mystical experience — that somehow makes it easier to let go. And I think some of it has to do with the fact that you do experience the "extinction" of yourself and it's kind of a rehearsal for death. And I think that may be part of what helps people, that they expand their sense of what is your self-interest and your self-interest is something larger than what is contained by your skin. And when you have that recognition, I think dying becomes a little easier. ...

There's no way to prove this, obviously, and it's a question that really troubled me as an old-fashioned materialist skeptical journalist. It's like, "What if these drugs are inducing an illusion in people?" I got a variety of answers to that question from the researchers. One was, "Who cares if it helps them?" And I can see the point of that. The other was, "Hey, this is beyond my pay grade; none of us know what happens after we die." And others say, "Well, this is an open frontier." ...

The experiences that people have are very real to them — they're psychological facts. And one of the really interesting qualities of psychedelic experience is that the insights you have on them have a durability ... This isn't just an opinion, this is revealed truth, so the confidence people have is hard to shake, actually.

On a Johns Hopkins study on the use of psilocybin to help people quit smoking

Smoking is a very hard addiction to break. It's one of the hardest addictions to break. [I wanted to understand] how, after a single psilocybin trip, they could decide "I'm never going to smoke again" based on the perspective they had achieved. And they would say things like, "Well, I had this amazing experience. I died three times. I sprouted wings. I flew through European histories. I beheld all these wonders. I saw my body on a funeral pyre on the Ganges. And I realized, the universe is so amazing and there's so much to do in it that killing myself seemed really stupid." And that was the insight. Yes, killing yourself is really stupid — but it had an authority it had never had. And that, I think, is the gift of these psychedelics.

On his own experience tripping on mushrooms

I had an experience that was by turns frightening and ecstatic and weird. ...I found myself in this place where I could no longer control my perceptions at all, and I felt my sense of self scatter to the wind — almost as if a pile of post-its had been released to the wind.

I had an experience that was by turns frightening and ecstatic and weird. ... I found myself in this place where I could no longer control my perceptions at all, and I felt my sense of self scatter to the wind — almost as if a pile of post-its had been released to the wind — but I was fine with it. I didn't feel any desire to pile the papers back together into my customary self ...

Then I looked out and saw myself spread over the landscape like a coat of paint or butter. I was outside myself, beside myself, literally, and the consciousness that beheld this ... was not my normal consciousness, it was completely unperturbed. It was dispassionate. It was content, as I watched myself dissolve over the landscape.

What I brought back from that experience was that I'm not identical to my ego, that there is another ground on which to plant our feet and that our ego is kind of this character that is chattering neurotically in our minds. And it's good for lots of things. I mean, the ego got the book written, but it also can be very harsh, and it's liberating to have some distance on it. And that was a great gift, I think.

Sam Briger and Seth Kelley produced and edited this interview for broadcast. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Scott Hensley adapted it for the Web.



from Hacker News https://ift.tt/YV9WJO
via IFTTT

Arizona Senate candidate kept talking about her mortgage. We can’t find it anywhere.

https://ift.tt/2ImaOaH

Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ), who is currently seeking her party’s nomination for retiring Sen. Jeff Flake’s (R) open seat, promised during her 2012 Congressional campaign that “truthfulness” and “integrity” would be “core values” of her campaigns. But that truthfulness may not have applied to her required disclosure statements.

Last week, ThinkProgress reported that as a House candidate, McSally argued that the federal government should not take action to help underwater mortgage holders — even those who were victims of predatory lending and misleading terms — because she believed in “individual responsibility.”

Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ) in 2015

No bailout for subprime mortgage victims, said Martha McSally. Try personal responsibility instead.

In a 2012 debate, she said the government should not help underwater homeowners because personal responsibility is better.

In that April 2012 candidates’ forum, she noted that she could relate to those who owed more on their mortgages than the properties were even worth because of her own experience investing in undeveloped real estate. “I bought land in Elgin in 2006. Oh, it had been climbing, climbing, climbing and, guess what, it was right before it all fell. I’m upside down on that as well,” she said, referencing 18 acres she owns in the Elgin Estates lots near Tucson, valued at between $100,001 and $250,000.

A ThinkProgress review of McSally’s financial disclosures since 2012 found no disclosure of any mortgage on that property (though she has reported owning the Elgin acres). Her initial filing included an October 2002 Bank of America Home Loans mortgage on her Tucson home and a separate USAA home equity line of credit on that. Her 2014 disclosure said that both were paid off in March 2013 thanks to a VA refinance (McSally was a longtime Air Force officer prior to her political career) and replaced with a Wells Fargo Bank Mortgage. Since 2015, she has also listed a separate September 2015 mortgage.

The instructions on the disclosure forms — mandatory for House candidates and Members of Congress — require the reporting of “liabilities of over $10,000 owed to any one creditor at any time during the reporting period.” While that excludes mortgages on any personal residence that does not yield rental income, automobile loans, household furniture or appliances, business liabilities, and liabilities to family members, it would appear to include a large mortgage on undeveloped investment real estate on which McSally does not live.

Asked for that initial story why her disclosure forms did not include any mortgage on the Elgin land, her spokesperson said in an email that the “Congresswoman has no loan on Elgin address, and it is therefore not a liability for her to disclose.”

But another 2012 campaign speech makes it clear that, at least back then, she did have a massive mortgage on that land — one that was simply not disclosed.

That year, in a February 22 speech to the overflow crowd outside a Tucson Tea Party event, McSally said that she had been raised in Rhode Island but owned two properties in her adopted home state of Arizona.

“I bought some land in Elgin in 2006, although the bank still owns most of it,” she told the crowd.

And just days before, in a radio interview, she said, “I own 18 acres of land in Elgin, although I haven’t paid it off yet, so I guess I don’t really own it.”

Her office responded to a ThinkProgress requesting additional clarification about the discrepancy, and the same spokesperson appeared to contradict her previous claim that she had no loan on that property. “Were her forms incorrect? Answer: No. Or was she wrong in her 2012 speech? Answer: No,” wrote the spokesperson in an email. “Both her forms and 2012 speech were correct.”

The discovery comes weeks after the Federal Election Commission (FEC) unanimously approved an audit that found McSally’s 2014 House campaign did not correctly report its finances and failed to collect employment information for more than 1,200 individual contributions.

Aaron Scherb, director of legislative affairs for the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause, told ThinkProgress that there is “unfortunately very little enforcement and verification of anything that’s contained in the [financial disclosure] reports” and that unless it was a pattern of intentional misstatements, the penalty is seldom more than a small fine.

Still, he notes, erroneous disclosures like these undermine public trust.

“I think every candidate or member of congress is ultimately responsible for the information that they include in their financial disclosure reports and FEC reports,” he concluded. “Repeated mistakes and errors can certainly undermine public confidence in an elected official’s ability to carry out one’s duties in public office.”




from Yglesias https://ift.tt/2aOiKwJ
via IFTTT

Motorleaf’s $2.85M Seed Round Accelerates AI in Greenhouse Operations

https://ift.tt/2Ks8knZ

Leading Investors Back Dynamic AI Technology That Improves Yield Predictions, Maximizes Profits

MONTREAL–(BUSINESS WIRE)–May 15, 2018–

Motorleaf – an artificial intelligence startup focused on bringing actionable, data-driven insights to greenhouse and indoor operators –announced today it has raised $2.85 million USD to further develop its real-time, agronomic solutions for the fast-growing controlled-environment agriculture sector.

The investment, closed in two rounds with the final $2 million USD committed this May, is led by top ag- and food-tech acceleration fund Radicle Growth and includes support from Desjardins Capital, Real Ventures, Fluxunit (Osram Ventures), BDC Capital and 500 Startups Canada.

“Motorleaf is changing the way we grow in greenhouses and indoors with their application of enabling AI anywhere at any time,” says Radicle Growth CEO Kirk Haney. “Their technology has been proven in vegetable production environments and we are investing this capital to help the company scale.”

Motorleaf’s hardware and software hones-in on the human and environmental aspects of greenhouse production, helping to predict accurate harvest amounts in a tight-margin industry. By providing a digital agronomist, Motorleaf’s yield prediction tools help greenhouse operators meet contract obligations, better plan weekly operations and foresee production capacities in real time.

In initial trials with California greenhouse SunSelect, Motorleaf’s technology led to a 50-percent reduction in yield prediction error in tomatoes. These results were enough for SunSelect to adopt Motorleaf’s algorithms after a short trial.

“Better yield prediction is only the beginning for Motorleaf’s value to this sector,” says Motorleaf CEO Alastair Monk. “We’re ultimately producing dynamic grower protocols, which help manage everything from light and nutrients to predicting crop diseases before they happen, and optimized growing conditions that increase ROI – all based on real-time data.”

The next phase for Montreal-based Motorleaf will take a broad look at greenhouse conditions and apply the technology to multiple crops. The data insights will not be a one-time, static prediction, but allow growers to adjust growing conditions and compensate for the unexpected.

“Motorleaf’s ability to apply automation by adding convenient hardware to preexisting greenhouse control systems makes them not only practical, but ready for today’s greenhouse industry,” says Haney. “The next round of solutions coming out of testing only highlight more of the potential insights this technology brings to the table.”

Motorleaf’s AI program stands to bring applicable, cost-cutting solutions to greenhouses surrounding labor, energy, over/under production and nutrient management. There are 52.3 billion square feet of greenhouses and indoor farms that can benefit from Motorleaf’s technology today.

Haney and Lars Roessler from Fluxunit will join Motorleaf’s Board of Directors, helping the company make connections with key industry players, expanding its global reach and furthering application of the machine learning algorithms in diverse indoor agriculture facilities.

More about our investors:

Radicle Growth

Desjardins Capital

Real Ventures

Fluxunit-Osram Ventures

BDC Capital

Grit Marketing, LLC
Kayla Hedrick
309-657-1858
kayla@marketingandgrit.com



from VentureBeat https://venturebeat.com
via IFTTT

John McAfee Under Siege – Going Underground

https://ift.tt/2Iknpeq

“Rob, I think you need to come out if you can… we're under siege."

Had anyone else other than John McAfee been at the other end of the line, I probably would have laughed out loud. But it was John McAfee, so instead I soberly packed a bag.

McAfee has on occasion been labeled as crazy by people who have never had

entire governments out to collect them

. He has been called paranoid by people who have never

had their lives threatened

. And he has been accused of grandiose delusion by people who themselves lack the nerve to

speak out against corrupt and tyrannical government agencies

. These assessments hold little weight with people that have witnessed first hand some of the trouble and strife that has followed McAfee since he

left Belize

in 2012. They hold little weight with people like his wife, Janice, who was with McAfee on several occasions when attempts were made to collect him. Or with his regular security detail, highly trained ex-military professionals, who recognize all too well the warning signs of potential life and death situations. The rest of us may have a difficult time comprehending his reality. As human beings, we rely heavily on our own frame of reference to relate to other people and their experiences, and to understand the world around us. For this reason, the affairs of extraordinary individuals can seem to be fantastic to people living ordinary lives. How could these things really be happening – nothing like that ever happens to me! With the case of John McAfee, employing this comfortable reasoning in an effort to understand his world is a grave error. Instead, we should seek counsel from the volumes upon volumes of McAfee's

well documented

life – packed with events so bizarre that the human mind could well go numb trying to comprehend that they actually happened. But this is the only context in which we can accurately perceive the harmony and sensibility in his words and actions.

WELCOME TO FORT MCAFEE

Arriving at the McAfee residence, the first thing that commands attention is the massive security presence. Security cameras capture every angle of the property as well as the road out front. Guns, security devices and surveillance equipment of every description can be found throughout the house, at hand for the instant they are needed. Armored doors and wall panels have been installed where appropriate, and McAfee's bedroom could accurately be described as a bunker. The regular security detail has been augmented in recent days with an influx of ex-military, private security professionals. Rounding out the lineup, several large dogs including several German shepherds and a pit bull have the run of the house and property. One thing rapidly becomes clear – anyone trying to collect McAfee from this location is going to have a rough time of it.

OPEN PLAINS TO THE LEFT

While McAfee's property is secure, the rest of the neighborhood is not. Adjacent to McAfee's property is a house with absentee owners, a summer home that lies vacant for most of the year. After spotting movement on the property one evening, McAfee and a member of his security staff decided to take a look around. What they found left little doubt that someone had recently been present, and had been attempting to conceal themselves from view. This property offers several vantage points from which an observer could remain unseen while enjoying a direct line of sight towards McAfee's bedroom and property. McAfee and his security professional checked each of these locations and found signs of a recent human presence. Trampled down grass, leaves and sticks snapped, a pristine Snickers candy bar wrapper, and exposed tree roots with fresh abrasions. “It was obvious." stated McAfee's security professional, who asked to remain anonymous. “All of my training combined with what I observed convinces me that a person or persons had occupied several spots in the recent past." Aside from the view of McAfee's house, these spots offer no amenity that would justify anyone occupying them at all. There is literally nothing else to do or look at. The only reason for someone to take up such a position would be to observe the McAfee residence without being seen themselves.

THE WORLD'S BUSIEST CUL-DE-SAC

McAfee's property occupies a

cul-de-sac

, which can be found at the end of a long dirt road. This road is littered with holes that can easily damage a car if hit at the wrong speed or angle. By the time a car reaches McAfee's house, it will be filthy with dirt on a dry day and caked with mud on a wet one. Not the kind of road one would select for a leisurely Sunday tour, especially considering the lack of destinations at the other end of it. We could reasonably expect that the only people that would use this road would be people that lived in one of the neighboring houses or visitors to those houses, be them guests or service workers. Not so this cul-de-sac in small town Tennessee. Here, many people regularly decide to brave the rough dirt road for an opportunity to drive slowly around the cul-de-sac, in some cases stopping at the end of McAfee's driveway, only to leave after visiting none of the available houses. This might be understandable once or twice a month, the occasional lost soul or curiosity seeker, but here they occur almost daily, sometimes multiple times in a day. Cul-de-sacs, even those not at the end of extremely rough dirt roads, are notoriously quiet from a traffic perspective. The traffic patterns on McAfee's cul-de-sac are anything but quiet, and given the lack of interesting features besides McAfee, only one reasonable conclusion can be reached: the highly unusual traffic patterns are due to John McAfee's presence. This is the conclusion reached by McAfee and his security team. All of this activity was recorded by the security cameras, but the team sought to obtain better images with faces and license plates. In all cases, attempts to film these vehicles resulted in them leaving quickly, a few times at extreme speeds. On one occasion when someone got close enough to try to film the occupants, they were spotted and the passenger covered their face with their hands while the driver zoomed off at unsafe speeds down the rough, pitted dirt road. “All of my instincts point in one direction," stated Jimmy Watson, former Navy Seal and also a member of McAfee's security detail. “We've had a white single engine plane circle the property at low altitude for almost an hour. It has visited us several times. That's not normal." Watson goes on talk about other occurrences, including obvious signaling using lights that he observed in the woods adjacent to the house. Highly trained in the art of professional observation, and not given to hysteria, Watson's cool recollections and detailed analysis make a stark impression on the listener.

MAKING IDENTIFICATIONS

Faces have proved difficult to photograph, but McAfee and his team obtained several photos of the license plates of cars visiting the cul-de-sac. Anyone can use the Internet to research plates these days; when you're John McAfee it is the easiest thing in the world.

Searches of these plates revealed the vital statistics of an interesting group of people. The cars were all registered under what most people would consider to be odd names. Most of the registration addresses were out-of-state, a Las Vegas address with Tennessee plates for example, which should be impossible. The individuals, some in their 80's and 90's, all had no criminal records, no record of ever having owned anything, no presence or mention on social media – in fact no other public records of any kind. The only legal process they had ever encountered in their long lives was to register plates in Tennessee. The identities were fake, which is unsurprising considering that some of the license plates were too. Some of the plates had letters or numbers that were crooked or the wrong shape. These plates had been forged to point to identities that themselves did not appear to be real. Someone had gone to a lot of effort to ensure that these plates would trace back to smoke. The occupants of the vehicles also did not match up with the vital statistics of the registered owners. One car registered to a 98 year old man with only an initial for his last name was driven by 3 Hispanic males that appeared to be in their early 20's. Other apparent mismatches were less extreme but still suggest that the registered owner was a fiction. If we accept for a moment that John McAfee is not unduly paranoid, and these visits are indeed targeted at him, we must also then accept the reality that this is the result of a sophisticated, and expensive, effort. These are not curiosity seekers out to catch a glimpse of a famous madman watering his lawn in his shorts. These are well supplied, well connected people with ready access to money and official state resources.

PLENTY OF SUSPECTS

There are no shortage of entities in this world that fit that bill and that also have beef with McAfee. McAfee

caused the government of Belize

, along with the drug cartels, a great deal of embarrassment. So much, in fact, that they have both been trying at intervals to collect him ever since. But McAfee has also made powerful enemies at home by being an outspoken critic of government overreach and the erosion of privacy. He has

embarrassed the FBI on national television

, for all to see, while at the same time calling public attention to their lust for more power. And for his latest trick, he has promoted cryptocurrency as a means to free humanity of being under the control of the financial elite. To McAfee, cryptocurrency represents an important component in a larger revolution, or rather an evolution, of the human species. The blockchain doesn't just allow for neat, digital coins that are easy to use. It contains the potential energy to transform how we live, and how we relate to each other and the world around us. McAfee talks regularly about how cryptocurrency will help us become free from the financial elite class, who have come to believe it is their privilege to coordinate the world that we all must live in, and then to tell us how we must behave in it. Free from overreaching government agencies like the SEC, whose de facto function is to ensure that only the elites can benefit greatly from the systems we all must share. For most this is a message of hope for the future. For those in control of things now, it is dangerous blasphemy that must be silenced. When I asked McAfee who he believed was behind the increasing pressure he has been observing, he replied quickly and without hesitation: the SEC. He has called out the SEC on Twitter, and has made clear that he does not believe that they have the mandate or authority to regulate cryptocurrencies or digital token platforms. As a leader in the space, his voice matters, and people are taking note. For the SEC, this is a problem.

When faced with extinction, any entity will react in a manner designed to preserve its own existence. McAfee has called the SEC obsolete in the coming paradigm; he has called into question their continuing right to exist. He also spends every waking moment promoting and nurturing the platforms that he believes are capable of bringing about this reality. It is only natural that they would move to put a stop to it.

COOL UNDER HEAT

With the pressure mounting and with the volume of suspicious activity increasing every day, most ordinary people would have cracked under the strain. But McAfee, surrounded by a security team that enjoys his full confidence and an old hand at this game, manages to take it in stride and find the humor in what is undoubtedly a difficult set of circumstances to live under.We spent one afternoon diving down the rabbit hole of online legal searching using some of the captured license plate numbers as a starting point. The point of the exercise was to demonstrate the lengths his visitors have gone to. This was demonstrated, but only after several grown men had been reduced to hysterics multiple times. Even under the gun, McAfee cannot help but revel in the absurdity and impossibility of the composite sketches of vital statistics returned.

McAfee also isn't taking the situation lying down. Whenever he find an email address that appears to actually be real, he makes an attempt at human contact with his persecutors. On my final day in town, McAfee attempted to contact a certain Mr. Ad Sad via email and asked him if he would like to get together for a movie. With a name like Sad, it certainly couldn't hurt.

GOING DARK

With an eye towards staying one step ahead of the enemy, McAfee has decided to go dark. During this interview preparations were underway to relocate McAfee to an undisclosed, secure location where he intends to maintain radio silence and monitor the situation closely. In his absence his Twitter account will be manned by members of the

McAfee Crypto Team

, who will be providing status updates as they happen.“This is not about me. I'm 72 years old people – please!" stated McAfee, discussing his reasons for going underground. “The SEC wants to destroy a revolution – a movement of the people – by making an example out of me. I cannot allow that to happen." Asked whether he believes he'll be able to come through intact, McAfee's answer was simple and to the point.“I always do."



from Hacker News https://ift.tt/YV9WJO
via IFTTT